Ruthless For The Truth
Printed on recycled virtual paper
No
trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Some how my dear friends I have lost a page
here...it defaulted to this one, I will work on finding it over the next week
and if worst come to worst I will just start over from here...sorry...
June 25 2011
Tata
Motors is ready to introduce
the Air Car - Will it be the next big
thing? Tata
Motors is taking giant strides and making history for itself. First the Land
Rover/Jaguar deal, then the world's cheapest car, and now it is also set to
introduce the car that runs on compressed air.
With spiralling
fuel prices it is about time we heard some breakthrough!
India's largest automaker,
Tata Motors, is set to
start producing the world's first commercial air-powered vehicle.
The Air Car, developed by ex-Formula One
engineer Guy Nigre
for Luxembourg-based MDI, uses compressed air, as opposed to the
gas-and-oxygen explosions of internal-combustion models, to push its engine's
pistons. Some 6000 zero-emissions Air Cars are scheduled to hit Indian streets
by August
2011.
The Air Car, called the "MiniCAT" could cost
around Rs. 3,475,225 ($8,177.00) in
India and would have a range of around 300 km between refuels.
The cost of a
refill would be about Rs. 85 ($2.00)
The MiniCAT
which is a simple, light urban car, with a tubular chassis that is glued, not
welded, and a body of fiberglass powered by compressed air.
Microcontrollers are used in every device in the car, so one tiny radio
transmitter sends instructions to the lights, indicators, etc.
There are no
keys - just an access card which can be read by the car from your pocket.
According to the designers, it costs less than 50 rupees per 100 Km (about a
tenth that of a petrol car). Its mileage is about double that of the most
advanced
electric car (200 to 300 km or 10 hours of driving), a factor which
makes a perfect choice in cities where 80% of motorists drive at less than 60
Km. The car has a top speed of 105 Kmph.
Refilling the car will, once the market
develops, take place at adapted
petrol stations to administer compressed air. In two or three minutes,
and at a cost of approximately 100 rupees, the car will be ready to go another
200-300 kilometers.
As
a viable alternative, the car carries a small compressor which can be
connected to the mains (220V or 380V) and refill the tank in 3-4 hours. Due to
the absence of combustion and, consequently, of residues, changing the oil (1
litre of vegetable oil) is
necessary only every 50,000 Km).
The temperature of the clean air expelled by the exhaust pipe is between 0-15
degrees below zero, which makes it suitable for use by the
internal air conditioning system with no need for gases or loss of
power.
May 26, 2011
How has our world changed, look below and find out....
In ruthless act of economic warfare, TSA threatens to make Texas a no-fly
zone
 Wednesday,
May 25, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com |
NaturalNews) In what can only be called a ruthless threat of total economic
warfare, the TSA has threatened to enforce an economic blockade of Texas if the
state legislature passes its bill criminalizing the TSA's lewd pat-downs that
have agents reaching down the pants of innocent travelers (http://www.naturalnews.com/032401_T...).
Texas state Sen. Dan Patrick had sponsored the bill which initially earned
widespread support throughout both houses of the Texas legislature, but as the
bill neared final passage, the
TSA sent a threatening letter to
Texas explaining that if the
law were passed, the TSA
would block all flights to and from Texas cities.
The TSA threatens economic
warfare against Texas
The gloves are off, folks. The TSA is now engaged in what can only be called
an act of economic warfare against the state of Texas. This rogue agency,
which is staffed with power-hungry pedophiles, perverts and porn distributors (http://www.naturalnews.com/030787_c...),
is already asserting its false
power and threatening one of the largest economies in the world -- the state
of Texas -- with severe economic harm if its
lawmakers don't cave in
to the TSA's tyrannical demands.
Just to be perfectly clear what you're witnessing here, the TSA is saying that
if your state stands up for the Fourth Amendment rights of its own citizens,
then the federal
government will shut down all your
airports and refuse
to allow airplanes to take off or land in your state. This is a form of
economic tyranny being conducted by rogue federal agents who are
threatening to turn Texas into a no-fly zone.
This is an act of war against Texas.
And this war began with two rogue TSA agents paying a little visit to Sen.
Patrick at the Texas state Capitol in Austin. There, they laid out the terms of
their threat, saying they
would "close down all the airports in Texas."
Don't mess with Texas
But the feds have bullied the wrong state. Some lawmakers in Texas still
remember what freedom actually means. "There was a time in this state, there was
a time in our history, where we stood up to the federal
government and we did
not cower to rules and policies that invaded the privacy of Texans," said Sen.
Dan Patrick. (http://www.texastribune.org/texas-l...)
Today, Alex Jones is
part of a growing protest taking place on the front steps of the Austin State
Capitol building:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/feds-th...
Remarkably, the TSA claims it has the right under the U.S.
Constitution to
do anything it wants -- including reaching down your pants and feeling your
genitals -- without regard to the protections of the Fourth and Tenth
Amendments. The TSA, of course, has zero understanding of U.S. law or the
Constitution itself. It is, by any reckoning, a power-hungry, out-of-control,
lawless and utterly tyrannical group of government perverts and thugs who are
now engaged in the threat of economic warfare against the state of Texas.
We must not let the TSA rule over us any longer, or we will all be threatened
with yet more tyranny from this anti-American group of tyrants whose actions
closely resemble the schemes of terrorists.
Watch for more coverage of this issue here at NaturalNews.com and also at
www.InfoWars.com where
Alex Jones is on the front lines in Austin, Texas, on the steps of the Capitol
building joining the protests.
More details to come
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health author and
award-winning journalist with a strong interest in personal health, the
environment and the power of nature to help us all heal He has authored and
published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on
topics like health and the environment, reaching millions of readers with
information that is saving lives and improving personal health around the world.
Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who does not get paid to
write articles about any product or company. In 2010, Adams launched
NaturalNews.TV, a natural health video site
featuring videos on holistic health and green living. He also founded an
environmentally-friendly online
retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support
consumer advocacy programs. He's also a successful software entrepreneur, having
founded a well known email marketing
software company whose technology currently powers the NaturalNews email
newsletters. Adams also serves as the executive director of the
Consumer Wellness Center, a
non-profit consumer protection group, and pursues hobbies such as martial arts,
Capoeira, nature macrophotography and organic gardening. He's also author of
numerous health books published by
Truth Publishing and is the creator of several consumer-oriented grassroots
campaigns, including the Spam. Don't Buy
It! campaign, and the free downloadable
Honest Food Guide. He also created
the free reference sites
HerbReference.com and
HealingFoodReference.com. Adams believes in free speech, free access to
nutritional supplements and the ending of corporate control over medicines,
genes and seeds. Known by his callsign, the 'Health Ranger,' Adams posts his
missions statements, health statistics and health photos at
www.HealthRanger.org
Jan 4, 2011
In regards to recent strange animal related
phenomenon in Arkansas, I must question the sources of the information.
Unbeknownst to most people, Arkansas sits on
several dead volcanoes. It is one of these monster volcanoes that produce the
lovely hot springs in the city of name sake. Our diamond mines are also the
result of a huge volcano that created the keno light pipes that produce the
diamonds. In resent news, we have experienced unusual earthquake activity in
the amount of over 500 small quakes in a few short months; these are the same
type of low level rumbles that are produced in Yellow Stone, which is known to
be an awaking super volcano. When studying other such volcanic activity sites,
one often sees the first warning signs as animals dying off with no visible
signs of trauma, this is due to volcanic gases venting and if such an event took
place quickly enough it would kill smaller life forms, i.e. insects, drawing
things such as birds into a death trap, once dissipated it leaves little traces
of the main event. The fish too may be a warning as lakes and rivers heat up,
release gases and more often than not produce high number of fish kills. To
ignore that these events are all taking place in similar cause of action is to
be rather on the side of the fool who waits for death without reason. It is
senseless in this age not to see that these things are most likely connected and
should be studied further. These events are not the result of fireworks, hail
on a rainless, clear skys day or other such tripe, but or a bigger problem
under the very ground we stand upon. Please pull the preverbal donkey from the
well and think with reason and clarity and deal with the world around you
instead of trusting idol minded fools who would lead you all to death with no
hesitation or regret.
The Red Cross bans Christmas
by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail
Christmas has been banned by the Red Cross from its 430 fund-raising
shops.
Staff have been ordered to take down decorations and to remove any other
signs of the Christian festival because they could offend Moslems.
The charity's politically-correct move triggered an avalanche of
criticism and mockery last night - from Christians and Moslems.
Christine Banks, a volunteer at a Red Cross shop in New Romney, Kent,
said: 'We put up a nativity scene in the window and were told to take it
out. It seems we can't have anything that means Christmas. We're allowed to
have some tinsel but that's it.
'When we send cards they have to say season's greetings or best wishes.
They must not be linked directly to Christmas.
'When we asked we were told it is because we must not upset Moslems.'
Mrs Banks added: ' We have been instructed that we can't say anything
about Christmas and we certainly can't have a Christmas tree.
' I think the policy is offensive to Moslems as well as to us. No
reasonable person can object to Christians celebrating Christmas. But we are
not supposed to show any sign of Christianity at all.'
Labour peer Lord Ahmed, one of the country's most prominent Moslem
politicians, said: 'It is stupid to think Moslems would be offended.
'The Moslem community has been talking to Christians for the past 1,400
years. The teachings from Islam are that you should respect other faiths.'
He added: 'In my business all my staff celebrate Christmas and I
celebrate with them. It is absolutely not the case that Christmas could
damage the Red Cross reputation for neutrality - I think their people have
gone a little bit over the top.'
The furore is a fresh blow to the image of what was once one of Britain's
most respected charities.
The British Red Cross lost friends this year over its support for the
French illegal immigrant camp at Sangatte and its insistence on
concentrating large efforts on helping asylum seekers.
Yesterday officials at the charity's London HQ confirmed that Christmas
is barred from the 430 shops which contributed more than £20million to its
income last year.
'The Red Cross is a neutral organisation and we don't want to be aligned
with any political party or particular philosophy,' a spokesman said.
'We don't want to be seen as a Christian or Islamic or Jewish
organisation because that might compromise our ability to work in conflict
situations around the world.'
He added: 'In shops people can put up decorations like tinsel or snow
which are seasonal. But the guidance is that things representative of
Christmas cannot be shown.'
Volunteers, however, said they believed the Christmas ban was a product
of political correctness of the kind that led Birmingham's leaders to order
their city to celebrate 'Winterval'.
Rod Thomas, a Plymouth vicar and spokesman for the Reform evangelical
grouping in the Church of England, said: 'People who hold seriously to their
faith are respected by people of other faiths. They should start calling
themselves the Red Splodge. All their efforts will only succeed in
alienating most people.'
Major Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said: 'There is
really nothing to hurt the Red Cross in Christmas, is there? Would the Red
Crescent stop its staff observing Ramadan?
'In practice, the role of the Red Cross is to run prisoner- of-war
programmes and relief efforts for civilians. Those activities require the
agreement of both sides in a conflict in the first place. Celebrating
Christmas in a shop in England could hardly upset that.'
Major Heyman added: 'Moslems are just as sensible about these things as
Christians. The Red Cross is just engaging in a bit of political
correctness.'
British Red Cross leaders have, however, not extended the ban to their
own profitable products. Items currently on sale include Christmas cards
featuring angels and wise men and Advent calendars with nativity scenes.
The spokesman said: 'The Red Cross is trying to be inclusive and we
recognise there are lots of people who want to buy Christmas cards which
they know will benefit us.'
The charity's umbrella body, the Swiss-based International Red Cross, has
also had politically-correct doubts about its famous symbol. But efforts to
find an alternative were abandoned in the face of protest and ridicule five
years ago.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152361/The-Red-Cross-bans-Christmas.html#ixzz18VyTvLUz
December 18, 2010
The Red Cross bans Christmas
by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail
Christmas has been banned by the Red Cross from its 430 fund-raising shops.
Staff have been ordered to take down decorations and to remove any other signs
of the Christian festival because they could offend Moslems.
The charity's politically-correct move triggered an avalanche of criticism and
mockery last night - from Christians and Moslems.
Christine Banks, a volunteer at a Red Cross shop in New Romney, Kent, said: 'We
put up a nativity scene in the window and were told to take it out. It seems we
can't have anything that means Christmas. We're allowed to have some tinsel but
that's it.
'When we send cards they have to say season's greetings or best wishes. They
must not be linked directly to Christmas.
'When we asked we were told it is because we must not upset Moslems.'
Mrs Banks added: ' We have been instructed that we can't say anything about
Christmas and we certainly can't have a Christmas tree.
' I think the policy is offensive to Moslems as well as to us. No reasonable
person can object to Christians celebrating Christmas. But we are not supposed
to show any sign of Christianity at all.'
Labour peer Lord Ahmed, one of the country's most prominent Moslem politicians,
said: 'It is stupid to think Moslems would be offended.
'The Moslem community has been talking to Christians for the past 1,400 years.
The teachings from Islam are that you should respect other faiths.'
He added: 'In my business all my staff celebrate Christmas and I celebrate with
them. It is absolutely not the case that Christmas could damage the Red Cross
reputation for neutrality - I think their people have gone a little bit over the
top.'
The furore is a fresh blow to the image of what was once one of Britain's most
respected charities.
The British Red Cross lost friends this year over its support for the French
illegal immigrant camp at Sangatte and its insistence on concentrating large
efforts on helping asylum seekers.
Yesterday officials at the charity's London HQ confirmed that Christmas is
barred from the 430 shops which contributed more than £20million to its income
last year.
'The Red Cross is a neutral organisation and we don't want to be aligned with
any political party or particular philosophy,' a spokesman said.
'We don't want to be seen as a Christian or Islamic or Jewish organisation
because that might compromise our ability to work in conflict situations around
the world.'
He added: 'In shops people can put up decorations like tinsel or snow which are
seasonal. But the guidance is that things representative of Christmas cannot be
shown.'
Volunteers, however, said they believed the Christmas ban was a product of
political correctness of the kind that led Birmingham's leaders to order their
city to celebrate 'Winterval'.
Rod Thomas, a Plymouth vicar and spokesman for the Reform evangelical grouping
in the Church of England, said: 'People who hold seriously to their faith are
respected by people of other faiths. They should start calling themselves the
Red Splodge. All their efforts will only succeed in alienating most people.'
Major Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said: 'There is really
nothing to hurt the Red Cross in Christmas, is there? Would the Red Crescent
stop its staff observing Ramadan?
'In practice, the role of the Red Cross is to run prisoner- of-war programmes
and relief efforts for civilians. Those activities require the agreement of both
sides in a conflict in the first place. Celebrating Christmas in a shop in
England could hardly upset that.'
Major Heyman added: 'Moslems are just as sensible about these things as
Christians. The Red Cross is just engaging in a bit of political correctness.'
British Red Cross leaders have, however, not extended the ban to their own
profitable products. Items currently on sale include Christmas cards featuring
angels and wise men and Advent calendars with nativity scenes.
The spokesman said: 'The Red Cross is trying to be inclusive and we recognise
there are lots of people who want to buy Christmas cards which they know will
benefit us.'
The charity's umbrella body, the Swiss-based International Red Cross, has also
had politically-correct doubts about its famous symbol. But efforts to find an
alternative were abandoned in the face of protest and ridicule five years ago.
Explore more:
Places:
Birmingham,
United Kingdom
Organisations:
British Red Cross,
Anglican
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152361/The-Red-Cross-bans-Christmas.html#ixzz18W1Tqfqz
The Red Cross bans Christmas
by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail
Christmas has been banned by the Red Cross from its 430 fund-raising
shops.
Staff have been ordered to take down decorations and to remove any other
signs of the Christian festival because they could offend Moslems.
The charity's politically-correct move triggered an avalanche of
criticism and mockery last night - from Christians and Moslems.
Christine Banks, a volunteer at a Red Cross shop in New Romney, Kent,
said: 'We put up a nativity scene in the window and were told to take it
out. It seems we can't have anything that means Christmas. We're allowed to
have some tinsel but that's it.
'When we send cards they have to say season's greetings or best wishes.
They must not be linked directly to Christmas.
'When we asked we were told it is because we must not upset Moslems.'
Mrs Banks added: ' We have been instructed that we can't say anything
about Christmas and we certainly can't have a Christmas tree.
' I think the policy is offensive to Moslems as well as to us. No
reasonable person can object to Christians celebrating Christmas. But we are
not supposed to show any sign of Christianity at all.'
Labour peer Lord Ahmed, one of the country's most prominent Moslem
politicians, said: 'It is stupid to think Moslems would be offended.
'The Moslem community has been talking to Christians for the past 1,400
years. The teachings from Islam are that you should respect other faiths.'
He added: 'In my business all my staff celebrate Christmas and I
celebrate with them. It is absolutely not the case that Christmas could
damage the Red Cross reputation for neutrality - I think their people have
gone a little bit over the top.'
The furore is a fresh blow to the image of what was once one of Britain's
most respected charities.
The British Red Cross lost friends this year over its support for the
French illegal immigrant camp at Sangatte and its insistence on
concentrating large efforts on helping asylum seekers.
Yesterday officials at the charity's London HQ confirmed that Christmas
is barred from the 430 shops which contributed more than £20million to its
income last year.
'The Red Cross is a neutral organisation and we don't want to be aligned
with any political party or particular philosophy,' a spokesman said.
'We don't want to be seen as a Christian or Islamic or Jewish
organisation because that might compromise our ability to work in conflict
situations around the world.'
He added: 'In shops people can put up decorations like tinsel or snow
which are seasonal. But the guidance is that things representative of
Christmas cannot be shown.'
Volunteers, however, said they believed the Christmas ban was a product
of political correctness of the kind that led Birmingham's leaders to order
their city to celebrate 'Winterval'.
Rod Thomas, a Plymouth vicar and spokesman for the Reform evangelical
grouping in the Church of England, said: 'People who hold seriously to their
faith are respected by people of other faiths. They should start calling
themselves the Red Splodge. All their efforts will only succeed in
alienating most people.'
Major Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said: 'There is
really nothing to hurt the Red Cross in Christmas, is there? Would the Red
Crescent stop its staff observing Ramadan?
'In practice, the role of the Red Cross is to run prisoner- of-war
programmes and relief efforts for civilians. Those activities require the
agreement of both sides in a conflict in the first place. Celebrating
Christmas in a shop in England could hardly upset that.'
Major Heyman added: 'Moslems are just as sensible about these things as
Christians. The Red Cross is just engaging in a bit of political
correctness.'
British Red Cross leaders have, however, not extended the ban to their
own profitable products. Items currently on sale include Christmas cards
featuring angels and wise men and Advent calendars with nativity scenes.
The spokesman said: 'The Red Cross is trying to be inclusive and we
recognise there are lots of people who want to buy Christmas cards which
they know will benefit us.'
The charity's umbrella body, the Swiss-based International Red Cross, has
also had politically-correct doubts about its famous symbol. But efforts to
find an alternative were abandoned in the face of protest and ridicule five
years ago.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152361/The-Red-Cross-bans-Christmas.html#ixzz18W1Tqfqz
The Red Cross bans Christmas
by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail
Christmas has been banned by the Red Cross from its 430 fund-raising
shops.
Staff have been ordered to take down decorations and to remove any other
signs of the Christian festival because they could offend Moslems.
The charity's politically-correct move triggered an avalanche of
criticism and mockery last night - from Christians and Moslems.
Christine Banks, a volunteer at a Red Cross shop in New Romney, Kent,
said: 'We put up a nativity scene in the window and were told to take it
out. It seems we can't have anything that means Christmas. We're allowed to
have some tinsel but that's it.
'When we send cards they have to say season's greetings or best wishes.
They must not be linked directly to Christmas.
'When we asked we were told it is because we must not upset Moslems.'
Mrs Banks added: ' We have been instructed that we can't say anything
about Christmas and we certainly can't have a Christmas tree.
' I think the policy is offensive to Moslems as well as to us. No
reasonable person can object to Christians celebrating Christmas. But we are
not supposed to show any sign of Christianity at all.'
Labour peer Lord Ahmed, one of the country's most prominent Moslem
politicians, said: 'It is stupid to think Moslems would be offended.
'The Moslem community has been talking to Christians for the past 1,400
years. The teachings from Islam are that you should respect other faiths.'
He added: 'In my business all my staff celebrate Christmas and I
celebrate with them. It is absolutely not the case that Christmas could
damage the Red Cross reputation for neutrality - I think their people have
gone a little bit over the top.'
The furore is a fresh blow to the image of what was once one of Britain's
most respected charities.
The British Red Cross lost friends this year over its support for the
French illegal immigrant camp at Sangatte and its insistence on
concentrating large efforts on helping asylum seekers.
Yesterday officials at the charity's London HQ confirmed that Christmas
is barred from the 430 shops which contributed more than £20million to its
income last year.
'The Red Cross is a neutral organisation and we don't want to be aligned
with any political party or particular philosophy,' a spokesman said.
'We don't want to be seen as a Christian or Islamic or Jewish
organisation because that might compromise our ability to work in conflict
situations around the world.'
He added: 'In shops people can put up decorations like tinsel or snow
which are seasonal. But the guidance is that things representative of
Christmas cannot be shown.'
Volunteers, however, said they believed the Christmas ban was a product
of political correctness of the kind that led Birmingham's leaders to order
their city to celebrate 'Winterval'.
Rod Thomas, a Plymouth vicar and spokesman for the Reform evangelical
grouping in the Church of England, said: 'People who hold seriously to their
faith are respected by people of other faiths. They should start calling
themselves the Red Splodge. All their efforts will only succeed in
alienating most people.'
Major Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said: 'There is
really nothing to hurt the Red Cross in Christmas, is there? Would the Red
Crescent stop its staff observing Ramadan?
'In practice, the role of the Red Cross is to run prisoner- of-war
programmes and relief efforts for civilians. Those activities require the
agreement of both sides in a conflict in the first place. Celebrating
Christmas in a shop in England could hardly upset that.'
Major Heyman added: 'Moslems are just as sensible about these things as
Christians. The Red Cross is just engaging in a bit of political
correctness.'
British Red Cross leaders have, however, not extended the ban to their
own profitable products. Items currently on sale include Christmas cards
featuring angels and wise men and Advent calendars with nativity scenes.
The spokesman said: 'The Red Cross is trying to be inclusive and we
recognise there are lots of people who want to buy Christmas cards which
they know will benefit us.'
The charity's umbrella body, the Swiss-based International Red Cross, has
also had politically-correct doubts about its famous symbol. But efforts to
find an alternative were abandoned in the face of protest and ridicule five
years ago.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152361/The-Red-Cross-bans-Christmas.html#ixzz18VyTvLUz
Click on the achieves button to view any of the stories shown on this site in
the past.
Come on
read some really great stuff....go on try it now!
number 2
number 3
Email Us
raziel133@yahoo.com
Back to Main Gallery